Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pawel Juszczak vs Sander Jong Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Juszczak vs Jong analysis and find out who is favored!
Pawel Juszczak vs Sander Jong Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Juszczak 0 - 1 Jong
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Juszczak has won 53.64% of points on their second serve, while Jong has won 53.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Juszczak, in recent form, has won 51.71% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jong has won 48.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.84% and 33.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Juszczak has saved 59.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jong has saved 55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Juszczak has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 35/ 14), with Jong winning 69.05% (W/L 58/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Juszczak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 239/ 151), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Jong has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 75% (W/L 6/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 19/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Juszczak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.42% of matches (W/L 32/ 11), where as Jong has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.88% of matches (W/L 58/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Juszczak winning 0 times and Jong being victorious 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Juszczak winning 1 and Jong winning 2. The last match between Juszczak and Jong was at the M15 Prijedor, 19-05-2024, Final, Clay with Sander Jong getting the victory 6-1 5-7 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:15:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Juszczak and Jong have played a deciding set 1 times, with Juszczak winning 0 times and Jong 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Juszczak winning 0, and Jong 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Juszczak has played against opponents with an average rank of 154.86 while Jong has played against players with an average rank of 169.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Juszczak has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jong has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Juszczak has converted 56.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jong has converted 42.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
592
Rank
393
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
478
Rank
478
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
61% (303-193)
Career Total W/L
65% (74-40)
73% (16-6)
YTD W/L
67% (22-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Pawel Juszczak | Sander Jong |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 11 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:0 | 2:15:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (54/85) | 65% (54/83) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 50% (27/54) | 70% (38/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (14/31) | 55% (16/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 50% (6/12) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (29/83) | 52% (44/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 5-7 6-3 |
Stats 
Sander Jong
Player
Pawel Juszczak
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pawel Juszczak | Sander Jong |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (16/6) | 67% (22/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (35/18) | 63% (47/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (261/218) | 54% (392/334) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 73% (16/6) | 69% (9/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.62 |
| Aces Total | 31 | 221 |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 25 | 84 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:43 | 1:36:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 107.23 | 175.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (982/1586) | 63% (1296/2053) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (610/982) | 75% (966/1296) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (324/604) | 53% (404/757) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (87/153) | 43% (86/200) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (622/1451) | 39% (833/2141) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (16/6) | 67% (22/11) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 76% (16/21) | 67% (22/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (6/8) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (15/14) | 95% (21/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (15/1) | 5% (21/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 17% (12/2) |
Pawel Juszczak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Gian Marco Ortenzi
Player
Pawel Juszczak
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Federico Campana
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Vitek Horak
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Miljan Zekic
Player
Pawel Juszczak
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-2 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Gabriele Bosio
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Dusan Obradovic
72%
(
92 of
127)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
104)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
51 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Tim Ruehl
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Drazen Petrovic
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Pawel Juszczak
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
70
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Pawel Juszczak
Player
Andrej Nedic
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sander Jong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Sander Jong
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Corentin Denolly
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marc Antoine Gaillard
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Adam Briant
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Pawel Juszczak
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
70
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Sebastian Sorger
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
84%
(
76 of
90)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Sasa Markovic
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Marcel Zielinski
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Kirill Mishkin
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Sander Jong
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
39 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Juszczak Vs Jong Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
